|
Welcome to the Nunt Guestbook, the one and only spot online to spew vitriole, attack the apostastic or congratulate old Mingus on his newfound debauchery. Any quotes on this guestbook can and will be used for whatever purpose the author deems fit including; book jackets, condom wrappers and bus side advertisements. Enjoy. Click here to sign the guestbook.  Posted By: Jessica
Comments: Nunt...the answer to my prayers for some realness in this world...signed by Mingus himself...got the book from my mom Dee...you know from lotus land...she raves about you and I can see why...Mingus you truly are a poet..raw and biting but I felt every word...thank you for making this book...you have a fan for life in me...
Date Posted: 2005-05-20
Posted By: Mingus
Comments: I would, but I just don't remember dissing Canuck writers. In general, I think there's lots of great Canadian novelists. Where was it? I may have been drunk.
Date Posted: 2005-04-19
Posted By: mike
Comments: If you disagree you may insult me at this place:
myspace.com/the_mysterious_stranger
Date Posted: 2005-04-19
Posted By: mike
Comments: Your weird I like you but several weeks at virulent dot net you implied there are no great Canadian authors well young man I'm here to tell you your wrong.
Timothy Findley author of Pilgrim
Date Posted: 2005-04-15
Posted By: Mingus
Comments: Is this a joke?
If not - allow me to say - congratulations on finding my website. However, no one made you read the essay (which, spelled properly, is TOP TEN REASONS WHY IT'S STUPID TO BELIEVE IN GOD). And if you think it is not an original topic to write about, why did you respond? Nobody's touched on it here for years. It's an old essay.
In any case, trying to discuss religion with someone who doesn't understand rational thought is pointless. 'Faith' in modern science, IS mutually exclusive to spiritual faith. Evolution, natural selection, universal physics and genetics don't leave room for god or the supernatural. Your understanding of the scientific process is obviously limited, or you wouldn't use the weakest argument possible, concerning "The progression of science over the last, say, 400 years or so, shows quite clearly the tradition of fallibility and dubiousness in each successive generation's scientific assumptions of the universe."
Does that mean that all science is useless because it maybe discounted at some time in the future? As science progresses, we come to understand our theories in more depth. And the big laws don't change - thermodynamics, gravity, and evolution. Darwin's argument hasn't changed much since 1867 - we've simply filled in the holes, with chromosomes, genetic inheritance and the double helix.
You're right, though. I'm tired of debating religion. Like smashing one's head against an anvil.
Date Posted: 2005-03-23
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 You are currently on page 1
|
